🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the pressure of her father’s legacy. As the offspring of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the prominent English artists of the early 20th century, her identity was shrouded in the long shadows of history.

A World Premiere

Earlier this year, I reflected on these memories as I got ready to record the inaugural album of Avril’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring impassioned harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, this piece will grant new listeners valuable perspective into how the composer – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – envisioned her existence as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

Yet about legacies. It can take a while to adjust, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to distinguish truth from misinterpretation, and I was reluctant to confront Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, this was true. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be detected in numerous compositions, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only look at the titles of her parent’s works to realize how he identified as not just a flag bearer of UK romantic tradition but a advocate of the Black diaspora.

This was where Samuel and Avril appeared to part ways.

White America judged Samuel by the excellence of his music rather than the colour of his skin.

Samuel’s African Roots

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, the composer – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a Caucasian parent – turned toward his background. When the African American poet this literary figure came to London in the late 19th century, the young musician actively pursued him. He composed the poet’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year used the poet’s words for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, notably for the Black community who felt vicarious pride as the majority assessed his work by the excellence of his music as opposed to the his background.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not reduce his activism. At the turn of the century, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in England where he encountered the Black American thinker this influential figure and witnessed a series of speeches, including on the mistreatment of African people in South Africa. He was an activist until the end. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders like Du Bois and the educator Washington, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the US President on a trip to the US capital in that year. As for his music, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so high as a musician that it will endure.” He died in that year, at 37 years old. Yet how might her father have made of his offspring’s move to be in South Africa in the mid-20th century?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to South African policy,” appeared as a heading in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “seems to me the right policy”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she did not support with the system “as a concept” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, overseen by benevolent South Africans of every background”. Had Avril been more aligned to her family’s principles, or raised in the US under segregation, she could have hesitated about this system. However, existence had shielded her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a British passport,” she said, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my ethnicity.” So, with her “fair” appearance (according to the magazine), she traveled alongside white society, buoyed up by their acclaim for her late father. She gave a talk about her father’s music at the educational institution and led the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, including the heroic third movement of her composition, named: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a accomplished player on her own, she did not perform as the featured artist in her concerto. Rather, she invariably directed as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble played under her baton.

She desired, in her own words, she “may foster a transformation”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. After authorities became aware of her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her UK document failed to safeguard her, the British high commissioner recommended her departure or face arrest. She returned to England, deeply ashamed as the scale of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she stated. Compounding her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from that nation.

A Common Narrative

While I reflected with these shadows, I sensed a known narrative. The account of holding UK citizenship until it’s challenged – which recalls troops of color who served for the British in the global conflict and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,