🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."