Relatives' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.