🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.